Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) TikTok Instagram YouTube Spotify
    UOWTV
    • Home
    • Media
    • News
      • Arts & Culture
      • Govt & Politics
      • Sport
      • Tech & Research
    • Features
    • Podcasts
      • A Day In The Life Of…
      • Between the Mountains and the Sea
      • Beyond The Bubble
      • Early Start Expert Insight
      • Miks and Mads
      • The Buzz
      • What Can We Say Again?
    • RadioU
    • Alumni Stories
    • About
    • Contact
    UOWTV
    Home»News»Will Paris climate change agreement solve greenhouse gas emissions?
    News

    Will Paris climate change agreement solve greenhouse gas emissions?

    Natalie CupacBy Natalie CupacApril 13, 2016Updated:April 19, 2016No Comments2 Mins Read
    Climate Change
    Climate Change

    Australia would be one of the first countries to sign the Paris climate change agreement on April 22 in New York, the federal has announced.

    The agreement was made after years of deliberation between 195 nations. UOW lecturer Dr Geoff Kelly, whose research focuses on climate change and government actions to reduce greenhouse emissions, said the agreement was vital in the battle against climate change.

    “It is not possible through any national action to exclude the impacts of climate change on a country; equally it is not possible to achieve some international gain unless effectively all countries are committed to the purpose,” Dr Kelly said.

    “Efforts being made by some countries may simply be offset by actions by other countries. So the need for action is global; the impacts of the climate phenomenon are global; and hence the structures needed to mobilise international efforts also need to be global.”

    The Paris Agreement aims to limit greenhouse gas emissions and minimise global warming, but while it has been welcomed as a positive step some have said it does not go far enough.

    Professor Sharon Beder, an expert on environmental politics and policies, said despite Australia being a signatory to the agreement, very little would be done because action was not mandatory. She said the Australian government was “more concerned with facilitating coal extraction.”

    Prof. Beder said the agreement was flawed because it involved of vested interests, including fossil fuel-dependent corporations, opposing it. She said these corporations “used their financial, lobbying and propaganda resources to ensure politicians don’t agree to an effective agreement.”

    Follow on Facebook Follow on Instagram Follow on TikTok
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Threads Bluesky Email Copy Link
    Natalie Cupac

    Related Posts

    UOW alum emphasises importance of internships

    August 4, 2026

    NDIS cuts hit home

    July 7, 2026

    UOW expands student choice in revamped arts, social sciences degrees for 2027

    June 28, 2026
    OUR NETWORK
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • Spotify
    LATEST NEWS

    UOW alum emphasises importance of internships

    August 4, 2026

    NDIS cuts hit home

    July 7, 2026

    UOW expands student choice in revamped arts, social sciences degrees for 2027

    June 28, 2026

    News habits shift to social media

    June 17, 2026

    Cost of living rise hurts those in need

    June 17, 2026

    Electric vehicles sales soar

    June 15, 2026
    TikTok Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube Spotify
    © 2026 UOWTV.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.